Skip to main content

Jim Byrne Accessible Website Design Glasgow for The Third Sector, Voluntary, Charities and Not for Profits

Accessible, Responsive Website Design
Jim Byrne Web Designer

WCAG 2.2. Success Criteria 2.5.8, Target Size (Level AA) – A Summary

The release of WCAG 2.2 introduced two new level A success criteria and four new level AA success criteria.  In this post, I provide a summary of  Success Criteria 2.5.8, Target Size (Level AA).

The aim of Success Criterion 2.5.8 is to ensure users can click on website links and other page elements, without accidentally triggering adjacent links or targets. This is particularly important for individuals who find precise motor movements difficult. By providing adequate space between targets, and ensuring those targets are large enough, the likelihood of accidental activation of adjacent links or targets is minimised.

This requirement caters to impairments such as hand tremors, spasticity, and quadriplegia, and people using specialised input devices, rather than standard computer mice or trackpads. Meeting this criterion also enhances the usability of touchscreen interfaces.

Introducing a minimum target size

This Success Criterion establishes a minimum size. If that minimum size can’t be met, a minimum spacing requirement is stipulated. While it’s possible to meet the criterion with small targets, provided they are not too close to adjacent targets, adhering to larger target sizes is helpful for individuals with impaired motor skills. As a best practice, it’s recommended to meet at least the minimum size requirement, and for critical links or controls, striving for the more stringent 2.5.5 Target Size (Enhanced) is advised.


The criterion mandates a minimum target size of 24 by 24 CSS pixels. However, there are five exceptions:

  • Spacing: Targets less than 24 by 24 CSS pixels, are acceptable if positioned so that an area of minimum size 24px that creates a circle around the target does not intersect with another similar target.
  • Equivalent: If a target lacks a size equivalent to 24 by 24 CSS pixels, but another control achieving the same function meets the size requirement, an exception is granted based on equivalence.
  • Inline: The Success Criterion does not apply to inline targets within sentences or where target size is constrained by line-height. This is due to unpredictable text reflow based on viewport size.
  • User Agent Control: Default renderings of certain controls by browsers, like the days of the month calendar, are exempted from the target size requirement as long as the author hasn’t modified the default.
  • Essential: If target size and spacing are fundamental to conveying information, the “Essential” exception applies. For instance, in digital maps or interactive data visualizations where dense targets are necessary. Alternative ways of providing equivalent functionality are encouraged when this essential exception applies.

Accessibility auditing and consultancy

I provide comprehensive digital content accessibility consultancy services, including an accessibility auditing of your websites and documents – measured against the WCAG 2.2 standard. Get in touch to ensure your content is accessible to your widest possible audience and meets equality legislation requirements.

Take my Web Accessibility Online Training Course - WCAG 2.1 Compliance

Learn to design and manage WCAG compliant, accessible websites with my online course

You will learn both the techniques of accessible website design and an entire ‘framework for thinking about the subject’. It will equip you with the skills to understand, identify and fix issues any accessibility issues you come across. Watch the free videos to get a taste of what is on the course. Video image from Web Accessibility Online Training Course - WCAG 2.1 Compliance

Related content

Related content

View a list of all blog posts.

Written by :

Avatar of JamesByrne

Let's Chat

07810 098 119

“The audit was extremely comprehensive, clear and demonstrated Jim’s expertise in the area of accessible web design.” Peter Madden, Project Manager, Sealed Envelope Ltd